Making Mayoral Shows: History and Origins

History

Para1Throughout the Elizabethan, Jacobean, and Caroline periods, on October 29, the mayor elect of the City of London made his way to Westminster to swear an oath of allegiance to the king or queen. In the sixteenth century, a tradition of pageantry developed around this event, picking up where the Midsummer Shows left off and achieving a complex and expensive splendour before the shows were cancelled for the duration of the Civil War and Commonwealth period. The Midsummer Watch, the principal form of civic pageantry in the first half of the sixteenth century, included militaristic presentations, processions, and spectacles on the water, all of which came to feature in the mayoral shows, the first of which likely took place on October 29, 1535 (Lancashire 171-172). There are also similarities between mayoral shows and the medieval tradition of royal entries. They both traversed the traditional processional route along Cheapside, although the royal entry usually began at the Tower and moved west, while the mayoral procession completed a loop from the City to Westminster and back east through the City (Manley).

The Mayor and his Company

Para2The electoral system was oligarchical. The mayor was elected from and by the privileged members of the livery companies, usually after serving terms as alderman and sheriff. The mayor-elect had to belong to one of the twelve great livery companies, which sometimes required that a mayor translate from a lesser company to one of the twelve great companies before he took office (as Edward Barkham did in 1621 when he translated from the Leathersellers to the Drapers, much against the latter’s will). The livery company to which the mayor belonged received considerable attention and bore the cost of the show, as the pageant books often stress. While the shows often celebrate the trade practiced by the livery company sponsoring the show, most of the Jacobean mayors were economic high-flyers. Free of multiple trading companies such as the East India Company, the Muscovy Company, and the Merchant Adventurers, the mayor sometimes had little daily connection with his livery company. Nonetheless, each year, the wardens, assistants, and brothers of the mayor’s company organized and paid for the pageants that took place both on the Thames on barges and in the streets on wagons.
A painting of two bearded white men. The one on the left wears a red doublet and robe, a ruff, and a golden chain of office. He holds a pair of gloves. The one on the right wears a red doublet, green robes, and a ruff. He holds a red and gold sword. Both are wearing hats.
Hugh Alley, A caveatt for the citty of London. Call # V.a.318. Used by permission of the Folger Shakespeare Library.

Planning

Para3The livery company records offer elaborate details of the planning process as well as the various expenses, challenges, and partnerships that went into the production of a mayoral show, both before and after the festivities. Although the Malone Society Collections volumes III and V offer some selections from these company books in tandem with other accounts of the mayoral shows, Tracey Hill’s 2010 book Pageantry and Power showcases what can be accomplished through further historical inquiry into these records.
Para4Generally the company hired a poet to write the speeches and coordinate the entertainment. Regular pageant poets were well known playwrights: Anthony Munday, Thomas Middleton, Thomas Dekker, Thomas Heywood, and John Webster. We know that there was either regularly or on occasion a bidding process. In 1613, Munday, Middleton, and Dekker all presented a pitch to the Grocers for the mayoral show of that year, with Middleton’s sketch winning the competition and the other two dramatists receiving some compensation for their troubles. The pageant poet hired professional players to deliver the speeches and organized children to sing. While the arrangements for the printing of the books and erection of the various edifices was then handled by the pageant writer and artificer, the company managed the logistical affairs, which could range from mounting a galley-foist to compensating the child performers with a breakfast. The artificer or craftsperson built the edifices and devices that comprised the various pageants of a given show; this person worked closely with the pageant poet, as the two were responsible for managing the budgeted amount allocated to them by the livery company for making, writing, and printing the show based upon the invention approved by the livery company. The idea or narrative for the show was generally that of the poet who proposed it to the company often in competition with other dramatists.

Route, Shows, and Pageants

Para5The entire show was a peripatetic event consisting of multiple spectacles and pageants at traditional points on the water and on land. Upon returning from Westminster, the mayor landed at Paul’s Stairs or Baynard’s Castle, where the first pageant on land might take place. The mayor, entourage, and pageant (on a wagon) processed up Paul’s Chain to Paul’s Churchyard, where there might be another pageant waiting. As the procession moved on, the new pageant would join the end of the procession, eventually moving into Cheapside. The Little Conduit, the Cheap Cross, the Standard, and the Cheap Conduit were usual points for speeches, dramatic action, and tableau, each pageant being added to the end of the procession. At Laurence Lane end, the procession would make its way to Guildhall for the feast, leaving the pageants in Cheapside.
Para6This basic structure was expandable or contractable depending on the resources of the sponsoring company. In 1613, the Grocers added additional pageants before the mayor even took to his barge; in 1621, the Drapers (unhappy about having Barkham imposed upon them) did the bare minimum. The pageants might have an overarching loose narrative structure, or they might present discrete messages. Frequent characters were historical figures like Faringdon or allegorical figures like Envy.
Para7The pageants were propagandistic and didactic. Through both spectacle and speech, they celebrate the trade of the sponsoring company, working to represent its importance to the commonwealth. The speakers enjoin the mayor elect to be virtuous, generous, and wise, and to take no bribes. Sometimes, they also offer implicit or explicit lessons to the members of the sponsoring company. There was an effort to counsel English authority through spectacle and speech while celebrating the city’s role in governance. The company and mayor seemed to welcome these didactic moments, which worked to set a standard for mayoral and civic behaviour and thereby suggest the ultimate virtue of the office.
Para8A mayoral show was a truly collaborative enterprise that celebrated the livery company and London, but it took the entire city (onstage, behind the scenes, and in the crowd) to make it happen. All of the twelve companies celebrated these events, taking their company barges to Westminster with the mayor in the morning and returning to the City in order of precedence. They listened to the sermon at St. Paul’s and participated in the feast at the Guildhall. Their collective enterprise was frequently mentioned in the pageant books and performances.

Prosopography

Janelle Jenstad

Janelle Jenstad is a Professor of English at the University of Victoria, Director of The Map of Early Modern London, and Director of Linked Early Modern Drama Online. With Jennifer Roberts-Smith and Mark Kaethler, she co-edited Shakespeare’s Language in Digital Media: Old Words, New Tools (Routledge). She has edited John Stow’s A Survey of London (1598 text) for MoEML and is currently editing The Merchant of Venice (with Stephen Wittek) and Heywood’s 2 If You Know Not Me You Know Nobody for DRE. Her articles have appeared in Digital Humanities Quarterly, Elizabethan Theatre, Early Modern Literary Studies, Shakespeare Bulletin, Renaissance and Reformation, and The Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies. She contributed chapters to Approaches to Teaching Othello (MLA); Teaching Early Modern Literature from the Archives (MLA); Institutional Culture in Early Modern England (Brill); Shakespeare, Language, and the Stage (Arden); Performing Maternity in Early Modern England (Ashgate); New Directions in the Geohumanities (Routledge); Early Modern Studies and the Digital Turn (Iter); Placing Names: Enriching and Integrating Gazetteers (Indiana); Making Things and Drawing Boundaries (Minnesota); Rethinking Shakespeare Source Study: Audiences, Authors, and Digital Technologies (Routledge); and Civic Performance: Pageantry and Entertainments in Early Modern London (Routledge). For more details, see janellejenstad.com.

Mark Kaethler

Mark Kaethler is Department Chair, Arts, at Medicine Hat College; Assistant Director, Mayoral Shows, with MoEML; and Assistant Director for LEMDO. They are the author of Thomas Middleton and the Plural Politics of Jacobean Drama (De Gruyter, 2021) and a co-editor with Jennifer Roberts-Smith and Janelle Jenstad of Shakespeare’s Language in Digital Media: Old Words, New Tools (Routledge, 2018). Their work has appeared in The London Journal, Early Theatre, Literature Compass, Digital Studies/Le Champe Numérique, and Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative, as well as in several edited collections. Mark’s research interests include early modern literature’s intersections with politics; digital media and humanities; textual editing; game studies; cognitive science; and ecocriticism.

Navarra Houldin

Project manager 2022-present. Textual remediator 2021-present. Navarra Houldin completed their BA in History and Spanish at the University of Victoria in 2022. During their degree, they worked as a teaching assistant with the University of Victoriaʼs Department of Hispanic and Italian Studies. Their primary research was on gender and sexuality in early modern Europe and Latin America.

Bibliography

Hill, Tracey. Pageantry and Power. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010.
Lancashire, Anne. London Civic Theatre: City Drama and Pageantry from Roman Times to 1558. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Print.
Manley, Lawrence. Literature and Culture in Early Modern London. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Robertson, Jean, and D.J. Gordon, eds. Collections, Vol. III: A Calendar of Dramatic Records in the Books of the Livery Companies of London, 1485–1640. Oxford: Malone Society, 1954.
Robertson, Jean, and D.J. Gordon, eds. Collections, Vol. V: A Calendar of Dramatic Records in the Books of the London Clothworkers’ Company (Addenda to Collections III). Oxford: Malone Society, 1959-1960.

Orgography

LEMDO Team (LEMD1)

The LEMDO Team is based at the University of Victoria and normally comprises the project director, the lead developer, project manager, junior developers(s), remediators, encoders, and remediating editors.

MoEML Mayoral Shows (MOMS1)

The MoMS General Editors are Mark Kaethler and Janelle Jenstad. The team includes SSHRC-funded research assistants. Peer review is coordinated by the General Editors but conducted by other editors and external scholars.

Metadata