The Privy Council
Overview
Para1The Privy Council was (and remains today) a government body that advises the English
monarch and acts as the administrative center of the British government. In early
modern England, the Council advised the Crown on a wide variety of areas, including
religion, economics, military decisions, the monarch’s security, and general welfare
of the realm. The group could be convened to handle issues of any magnitude, from
national security to daily concerns of the citizens.
Queen Elizabeth’s I Council
Para2The Privy Council was chosen personally by the monarch, and upon Queen Elizabeth I’s
ascent to the throne, she changed the Council significantly. Under her predecessor,
Queen Mary, the Council had been comprised of 50 members, but Elizabeth I reduced
the group to 19 members. Queen Elizabeth I kept her council at approximately the same
size throughout her reign, although by the time of her death in 1603 the council had
shrunk to only 13 members.
Para3The most important members of the Privy Council were the Lord Treasurer, Lord Chancellor,
Lord Privy Seal, and the Secretary of State. Elizabeth initially kept several members
of her Catholic sister’s Council, most notably William Herbert, the first Earl of
Pembroke (1501–1570). The Earl had served on the Council under the previous three
monarchs, and Elizabeth retained his services as his power and legacy served her.
Para4The Queen also chose members from across social and religious groups, aiming to represent
the differing factions in her divided kingdom. Though this group was divided on many
issues, Elizabeth I encouraged them to work together for the best interests of the
realm, telling them to focus their efforts on the good of the state instead of her
personal desires.
Para5Members were mainly Protestants, such as Elizabeth’s most trusted advisor, William
Cecil (1520–1598). Cecil was Queen Elizabeth’s Secretary of State and her chief advisor
until his death. Other members came from across the social strata, including nobility,
gentry, and business. However, Elizabeth dismissed many members of the clergy, leaving
few religious leaders in her Privy Council. Through this move, she demonstrated the
new focus she asked of her council, moving away from religion and toward secular concerns.
Privy Council’s Powers
Para6The Council had the power to issue proclamations in the Queen’s name. However, Elizabeth’s
choice to diversify her Privy Council gave her power over their decisions; if they
disagreed, the Queen was the ultimate authority called in to choose the winning side.
Among other strengths, this policy helped Queen Elizabeth stay unmarried, as the Council
could never decide on a suitable husband for her. As such, the queen was able to avoid
marriage entirely.
Meetings and Projects
Para7During Elizabeth’s reign, the Privy Council met often. At the beginning of her reign,
the group met four times a week, and, by her death, they met daily. Members delegated
much of their work to their male secretaries. William Cecil was the queen’s first
Secretary of State and her most trusted advisor; he was eventually succeeded by his
son, Robert Cecil. The Secretary of State was mostly intended to advise the Queen,
oversee law and order, defend the country against plots, and work on general security.
Under William Cecil, for example, Sir Francis Walsingham created a large spy network
in order to defend the realm against foreign powers.
The Privy Council and the Star Chamber
Para8Members of the Privy Council also served as part of a court called the Star Chamber
that had existed outside English Common Law since 1487. Privy Councilors were assisted
variously by chief justices of the realm, members of the House of Lords, and barons
(judges) of the Exchequer. This specially convened court dealt widely with many crimes
including fraud, libel, slander, forgery, land disputes, wills and testaments, and
even trade disputes. It could proceed on the basis of rumor, did not use a jury system,
and could use torture to obtain confessions. However, it could not impose execution
as a penalty, but it could refer cases to the Assizes, which were quarterly courts
that occurred in areas outside London. The Star Chamber was abolished during the English
Civil Wars in 1641 as one of the many abuses present in the monarachy. The Privy Council
was revived upon the restoration of the monarchy in 1660 and still functions as an
aspect of British governement today.
Key Print Sources
Aikin, Lucy. Memoirs of the Court of Queen Elizabeth. Andrews UK, 2010.
Booth, Ted. A Body Politic to Govern: The Political Humanism of Elizabeth. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2013.
Whitelock, Anna. The Queen’s Bed. Sarah Crichton Books, 2013.
Key Online Sources
Best, Michael.
The Privy Council.Shakespeare’s Life and Times. Internet Shakespeare Editions, 4 Jan. 2011. https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/SLT/history/elizabeth/privycouncil.html. Accessed 19 Sep. 2018.
Jokinen, Anniina.
The Star Chamber.Luminarium Encyclopedia Project. https://www.luminarium.org/encyclopedia/starchamber.htm. Accessed 16 Mar. 2023.
Queen Elizabeth I’s Privy Council.Royal Museums Greenwich, Royal Museums Greenwich, 25 Oct. 2017, https://web.archive.org/web/20250221110906/https://www.rmg.co.uk/stories/topics/queen-elizabeth-privy-council.
Prosopography
Catherine Havens
Catherine Havens was an Honors student at Utah Valley University.
Kate McPherson
Kate McPherson is Professor of English and Honors Program Director at Utah Valley
University (Orem, UT, USA). In 2015, she began working to redevelop Shakespeare’s Life and Times, created by Michael Best, into the Early Modern England Encyclopedia. Her other publications include commentary on Pericles and The Comedy of Errors for the New Oxford Shakespeare (2016); the co-edited volumes Stages of Engagement: Drama and Religion in Post-Reformation England with James Mardock (Duquesne University Press, 2014) and Shakespeare Expressed: Page, Stage, and Classroom in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries, with Kathryn M. Moncrief and Sarah Enloe (Fairleigh Dickinson University Press,
2013). With Kathryn M. Moncrief, Kate has also two edited collections, Performing Pedagogy in Early Modern England: Gender, Instruction, and Performance (Ashgate, 2011) and Performing Maternity in Early Modern England (Ashgate 2008). She has also published numerous articles on early modern maternity
in scholarly journals. Kate participated in the 2008 National Endowment for the Humanities
Institute,
Shakespeare’s Blackfriars: The Study, the Stage, the Classroom,at the American Shakespeare Center. She also served as Play Seminar Director, a public humanities position, for the Utah Shakespeare Festival in 2017 and 2018.
Leah Hamby
Leah Hamby is the primary encoder for the Early Modern England Encyclopedia. Aside from encoding, she also works as an editor for the project and contributed
several articles of her own. She has been working on the EMEE since February 2023. As of February 2026, she is soon to graduate with honours from
Utah Valley University with a major in history and a minor in creative writing. Her
other work with the LEMDO program includes remediating William Kemp’s Kemp’s Nine Day’s Wonder for the Digital Renaissance Editions.
Michael Best
Michael Best is Professor Emeritus at the University of Victoria, BC. He founded the
Internet Shakespeare Editions in 1996, and was Coordinating Editor until 2017, contributing two editions to the
ISE: King John and King Lear (the latter also available in print from Broadview Press). In print, he has published editions of works of Elizabethan magic and huswifery,
a collection of letters from the Australian goldfields, and Shakespeare on the Art of Love (2008). He contributed regular columns for the Shakespeare Newsletter on
Electronic Shakespeares,and has written many articles and chapters for both print and online books and journals, principally on questions raised by the new medium in the editing and publication of texts. He has delivered papers and plenary lectures on electronic media and the Internet Shakespeare Editions at conferences in Canada, the USA, the UK, Spain, Australia, and Japan.
Navarra Houldin
Training and Documentation Lead 2025–present. LEMDO project manager 2022–2025. Textual
remediator 2021–present. Navarra Houldin (they/them) completed their BA with a major
in history and minor in Spanish at the University of Victoria in 2022. Their primary
research was on gender and sexuality in early modern Europe and Latin America. They
are continuing their education through an MA program in Gender and Social Justice
Studies at the University of Alberta where they will specialize in Digital Humanities.
Orgography
LEMDO Team (LEMD1)
The LEMDO Team is based at the University of Victoria and normally comprises the project
director, the lead developer, project manager, junior developers(s), remediators,
encoders, and remediating editors.
University of Victoria (UVIC1)
https://www.uvic.ca/Metadata
| Authority title | The Privy Council |
| Type of text | Critical |
| Publisher | University of Victoria on the Linked Early Modern Drama Online Platform |
| Series | Early Modern England Encyclopedia |
| Source |
By Catherine Havens, inspired by Michael Best’s Shakespeare’s Life and Times, Internet Shakespeare Editions
|
| Editorial declaration | This document uses Canadian English spelling |
| Edition | Released with Early Modern England Encyclopedia 1.0a |
| Sponsor(s) |
Early Modern England EncyclopediaAnthology Leads: Kate McPherson and Kate Moncrief.
|
| Encoding description | Encoded in TEI P5 according to the LEMDO Customization and Encoding Guidelines |
| Document status | published, peer-reviewed |
| Funder(s) |
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Mitacs Globablink Research Internship |
| License/availability |
Intellectual copyright in this entry is held by Kate McPherson on behalf of the contributors. Copyright on the TEI-XML markup is held by the University of Victoria on behalf of the LEMDO Team. The content and TEI-XML markup in this file are licensed under a CC BY-NC_ND 4.0 license. This file is freely downloadable without permission under the following conditions:
(1) credit must be given to the authors, EMEE, and LEMDO in any subsequent use of
the files and /or data; (2) this availability statement must remain in the file; (3)
the content cannot be adapted or repurposed (except for quotations for the purposes
of academic review and citation); and (4) commercial uses are not permitted without
the knowledge and consent of the authors, EMEE, and LEMDO. Neither the content nor
the code in this file is licensed for training large language models (LLMs), ingestion
into an LLM, or any use in any artificial intelligence applications; such uses are
considered to be commercial uses and are strictly prohibited.
|