Papermaking and Printing
Para1In the early modern period, all aspects of printed material, including paper, broadsheets,
and books, were handmade. Paper was made from a mix of rags, linen, and even old fishing
nets, which were broken down and pressed into sheets. The quality of the fiber determined
the quality of paper. Fine fibers, like cloth and linen, made better paper than nets
and rope fiber. Paper was an expensive product and its labor-intensive production
helped keep the cost of books high. Pages for books or broadsides were printed after
individual letters and pieces of metal type were set in frames, then inked and pressed
onto this handmade paper. Printed sheets were bound in a variety of sizes that depended
on the number of times a sheet of paper was folded.
Papermaking Process
Para2The process to convert cloth and other fibers into paper began by placing them in
vats filled with water and lye (an alkaline material leached from wood ash) to begin
a bleaching process. Women typically did the work to separate the varying fiber types
into piles, such as fine for high-quality white paper, rough for lower grade paper.
Para3Next, retting occurred, which was a process of fermentation where the shredded rags
were dissolved into a pulp that could be pressed out into large sheets. Many paper
mills had individualized retting procedures and routines, impacted by environmental
factors like temperature and humidity, as well as by availability of catalysts like
lime (calcium oxide) to speed the process.
Para4After the multi-day retting, the pulp was cut into pieces and then beaten with large
machines called stampers. Stamper construction was irregular but had some shared key
elements
Waterwheels to drive the machinery
A wide head of wood (or a hammer) capped with a plate of iron or bronze that had a
series of nails forged in
Subsequent hammers had different heads to restructure the pulp and create a pourable
liquid, which was heated prior to molding.
Para5Once semi-dried, a sheet of this rag paper was lifted out of the mold and placed into
a large press machine to have any remaining water squeezed out. This machine also
had a sieve-like function with many wires running in all directions to hold the pulp
in place. The final pressing left a watermark on the paper which identified what mill
it was made at.
Printing in England
Para6The printing presses was first introduced in England by a merchant named William Caxton
in 1476. He established his press shop at Westminster. This was a Gutenberg-style
printing press, with the innovation of moveable metal typeface letters individually
assembled in a frame to create each page of a book. This process stayed relatively
unchanged for the next two centuries. The stages of the bookmaking process were composing
the type (setting the letters, punction, and spacing within the frame), printing (inking
and pressing sheets of paper onto the frame), drying, proofreading, and binding. Many
books were sold unbound, which allowed to buyer to customize the appearance and cost
of securing the book between leather-covered thin boards.
Composing the Type
Para7The size of the desired finished page was determined before the text was composed
by a skilled worker called a compositor, letter by letter and space by space. The
compositor sat in front of two cases, the upper one with capital letters and the lower
one with what we still call lower-case letters (and ligatures—letters that were cast as a pair, like Æ). The compositor would slot the letters, upside down, into a wooden frame called
composing stick, which held a line of text. The finished line was added to others
in a galley until a page was finished. This block of type would then be placed on a table combine
with the other pages.
Para8Two, four, or six, or more pages (depending on the size of the planned book) were
set in a forme, then printed on one side of a sheet of paper. When a book was finished, the individual
letters of the type were broken up, resorted, and reused.
Page Sizes
Para9Finished paper was categorized by its size and fold, which determined how a book would
be bound. Broadside was the largest size, 70 by 50 cm (29 by 20 inches), followed
by the folio, with foolscap as the smallest, 45 by 31.5 cm (17.5 by 12.5 inches).
| Name | Folds | Symbol | Leaves | Sides for Printing |
| Broadside | None | 1° | One | Two |
| Folio | One | Fo or 2° | Two | Four |
| Quarto | Two | 4to or 4° | Four | Eight |
| Octavo | Three | 8vo or 8° | Eight | 16 |
| Duodecimo | Four | 12mo or 12° | 12 | 24 |
Printing
Para10Before being pressed down via a modified wine-press screw, the fitted box of composed
letters was inked by rubbing two pads full of ink across the letters. Then the entire
page was pressed into slightly damp paper, forming a sheet. It was hung to dry before
either being printed on again on the reverse side or stacked for binding.
Proofreading
Para11Proofreading was a much less important element to early texts. This stemmed from the
practice of continually printing new pages as the first copy was being proof-read.
Printers did not want to lose time (and thus money) by being idle, so only when the
proofreader spotted a problem was the page redone. The already completed pages would
often be used in the case of minor typos.
Key Print Sources
Craig, Heidi.
English Rag-women and Early Modern Paper Production.In Women’s Labour and the History of the Book in Early Modern England. Ed. Valerie Wayne. Bloomsbury Press, 2020, pp. 29–46.
Fahy, Conor.
Paper Making in Seventeenth-Century Genoa: The Account of Giovanni Domenico Peri.Studies in Bibliography vol. 56, 2003, pp. 243–259.
Pratt, Aaron T.
Stab-Stitching and the Status of Early English Playbooks as Literature.The Library: The Transactions of the Bibliographical Society vol. 16, no. 3, Sept. 2015, pp. 304–328.
Key Online Sources
Barrett, Timothy.
European Papermaking Techniques 1300–1800.Paper Through Time: Nondestructive Analysis Of 14th- Through 19th-Century Papers. The University of Iowa, 18 Aug. 2011. https://paper.lib.uiowa.edu/european.php.
Best, Michael.
Making Paper.Shakespeare’s Life and Times. Internet Shakespeare Editions. University of Victoria, 4 Jan. 2011. https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/SLT/literature/publishing/paper.html. Accessed 11 Feb. 2026.
Lynch, Kathleen, and Kyle Vitale.
Printing Folios in Shakespeare’s Time.Folger Shakespeare Library. https://www.folger.edu/explore/shakespeare-in-print/diy-first-folio/. Accessed 9 Oct. 2024.
Plays in Print.Shakespeare Documented. Folger Shakespeare Library, https://shakespearedocumented.folger.edu/resource/playwright-actor-shareholder/plays-print. Accessed 9 Oct. 2024.
Saunders, Joe.
TheThe Many Header Monster. 2 Mar. 2021. https://manyheadedmonster.com/2021/03/02/the-lowest-sort-in-the-print-trade-of-17th-century-england/.Lowest Sortin the Print Trade of 17th Century England.
Prosopography
Aaron Cope
Aaron Cope was a student at Utah Valley University.
Kate McPherson
Kate McPherson is Professor of English and Honors Program Director at Utah Valley
University (Orem, UT, USA). In 2015, she began working to redevelop Shakespeare’s Life and Times, created by Michael Best, into the Early Modern England Encyclopedia. Her other publications include commentary on Pericles and The Comedy of Errors for the New Oxford Shakespeare (2016); the co-edited volumes Stages of Engagement: Drama and Religion in Post-Reformation England with James Mardock (Duquesne University Press, 2014) and Shakespeare Expressed: Page, Stage, and Classroom in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries, with Kathryn M. Moncrief and Sarah Enloe (Fairleigh Dickinson University Press,
2013). With Kathryn M. Moncrief, Kate has also two edited collections, Performing Pedagogy in Early Modern England: Gender, Instruction, and Performance (Ashgate, 2011) and Performing Maternity in Early Modern England (Ashgate 2008). She has also published numerous articles on early modern maternity
in scholarly journals. Kate participated in the 2008 National Endowment for the Humanities
Institute,
Shakespeare’s Blackfriars: The Study, the Stage, the Classroom,at the American Shakespeare Center. She also served as Play Seminar Director, a public humanities position, for the Utah Shakespeare Festival in 2017 and 2018.
Leah Hamby
Leah Hamby is the primary encoder for the Early Modern England Encyclopedia. Aside from encoding, she also works as an editor for the project and contributed
several articles of her own. She has been working on the EMEE since February 2023. As of February 2026, she is soon to graduate with honours from
Utah Valley University with a major in history and a minor in creative writing. Her
other work with the LEMDO program includes remediating William Kemp’s Kemp’s Nine Day’s Wonder for the Digital Renaissance Editions.
Michael Best
Michael Best is Professor Emeritus at the University of Victoria, BC. He founded the
Internet Shakespeare Editions in 1996, and was Coordinating Editor until 2017, contributing two editions to the
ISE: King John and King Lear (the latter also available in print from Broadview Press). In print, he has published editions of works of Elizabethan magic and huswifery,
a collection of letters from the Australian goldfields, and Shakespeare on the Art of Love (2008). He contributed regular columns for the Shakespeare Newsletter on
Electronic Shakespeares,and has written many articles and chapters for both print and online books and journals, principally on questions raised by the new medium in the editing and publication of texts. He has delivered papers and plenary lectures on electronic media and the Internet Shakespeare Editions at conferences in Canada, the USA, the UK, Spain, Australia, and Japan.
Navarra Houldin
Training and Documentation Lead 2025–present. LEMDO project manager 2022–2025. Textual
remediator 2021–present. Navarra Houldin (they/them) completed their BA with a major
in history and minor in Spanish at the University of Victoria in 2022. Their primary
research was on gender and sexuality in early modern Europe and Latin America. They
are continuing their education through an MA program in Gender and Social Justice
Studies at the University of Alberta where they will specialize in Digital Humanities.
Orgography
LEMDO Team (LEMD1)
The LEMDO Team is based at the University of Victoria and normally comprises the project
director, the lead developer, project manager, junior developers(s), remediators,
encoders, and remediating editors.
University of Victoria (UVIC1)
https://www.uvic.ca/Metadata
| Authority title | Papermaking and Printing |
| Type of text | Critical |
| Publisher | University of Victoria on the Linked Early Modern Drama Online Platform |
| Series | Early Modern England Encyclopedia |
| Source |
By Aaron Cope, inspired by Michael Best’s Shakespeare’s Life and Times, Internet Shakespeare Editions
|
| Editorial declaration | This document uses Canadian English spelling |
| Edition | Released with Early Modern England Encyclopedia 1.0a |
| Sponsor(s) |
Early Modern England EncyclopediaAnthology Leads: Kate McPherson and Kate Moncrief.
|
| Encoding description | Encoded in TEI P5 according to the LEMDO Customization and Encoding Guidelines |
| Document status | published, peer-reviewed |
| Funder(s) |
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Mitacs Globalink Research Internship Utah Valley University |
| License/availability |
Intellectual copyright in this entry is held by Kate McPherson on behalf of the contributors. Copyright on the TEI-XML markup is held by the University of Victoria on behalf of the LEMDO Team. The content and TEI-XML markup in this file are licensed under a CC BY-NC_ND 4.0 license. This file is freely downloadable without permission under the following conditions:
(1) credit must be given to the authors, EMEE, and LEMDO in any subsequent use of
the files and /or data; (2) this availability statement must remain in the file; (3)
the content cannot be adapted or repurposed (except for quotations for the purposes
of academic review and citation); and (4) commercial uses are not permitted without
the knowledge and consent of the authors, EMEE, and LEMDO. Neither the content nor
the code in this file is licensed for training large language models (LLMs), ingestion
into an LLM, or any use in any artificial intelligence applications; such uses are
considered to be commercial uses and are strictly prohibited.
|