Selection of Plays: The Scope of <title level="m">Queenʼs Men Editions Scope Author QME Anthology Leads Conversion and Remediation LEMDO Team Queenʼs Men EditionsQME

The Queen’s Men Editions anthology is led by Helen Ostovich, General Editor; Peter Cockett, General Editor (Performance); and Andrew Griffin, General Editor (Text).

 Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada McMaster University Poculi Ludique Societas University of Waterloo University of Toronto Centre for Drama, Theatre & Performance Studies University of Victoria Friends of the ISE

Released with Queenʼs Men Editions 2.0

 University of Victoria on the Linked Early Modern Drama Online Platform

This file is licensed under a CC BY-NC_ND 4.0 license, which means that it is freely downloadable without permission under the following conditions: (1) credit must be given to the author, Queen’s Men Editions, and LEMDO in any subsequent use of the files and/or data; (2) the content cannot be adapted or repurposed (except in quotations for the purposes of academic review and citation); and (3) commercial uses are not permitted without the knowledge and consent of Queen’s Men Editions, the editor, and LEMDO. This license allows for pedagogical use of the critical paratexts in the classroom.

Production photographs and videos on this site may not be downloaded. They appear freely on this site with the permission of the actors and the ACTRA union. They may be used within the context of university courses, within the classroom, and for reference within research contexts, including conferences, when credit is given to the producing company and to the actors. Commercial use of videos and photographs is forbidden.

Queenʼs Men Editions

Page written by the QME Anthology Leads. First published in the QME 1.0 anthology on the ISE platform. Converted to TEI-XML and remediated by the LEMDO Team for republication in the QME 2.0 anthology on the LEMDO platform.

Encoded in TEI P5 according to the LEMDO Customization and Encoding Guidelines

n/a

 Published file. Checked metadata. Numbered paragraphs. Proofed text. Updated metadata Added citation link, deleted comments Removed front element from born-digital documents that should not have one. Rationalized metadata. Fully remediated content and encoding. Renamed document. Added xml:ids to divs. Converted document. Original peer-reviewed content added to XWiki by a member of the QME team or a member of the ISE team acting on behalf of QME. The earlier history of this content was not captured in metadata.
Selection of Plays

For Queen’s Men Editions we decided to make a fairly conservative choice, selecting the nine plays listed in McMillin and MacLean (McMillin and MacLean 88–89) on the basis that these published works identified themselves on the title page as Queen’s Men productions. We added Thomas Wilson’s The Three Ladies of London, even though it was written in 1581, before Wilson joined the Queen’s Men. The play was published in 1584; it was expanded and republished in 1592, suggesting that the play had been performed successfully by the Queen’s Men. Wilson also wrote the sequel, The Three Lords and Three Ladies of London, written after the defeat of the Spanish Armada, 1588, and published in 1590. The two plays use many of the same characters and the second continues the story of the three ladies, left in a kind of limbo at the end of the first play.

The fact of the sequel is not the only reason for including Wilson’s 1581 play. That play illustrates most of the traits we have come to associate with Queen’s Men house style. The verse form is irregular, anything from short lines to fourteeners to prose. The topics ranged from early English history, mythology, magical transformation, religious conversion, romance, swordplay and wordplay, lively storytelling including folk tales, and comic business of all kinds. All the plays might be loosely considered comedies, as they all have happy endings and restorations, but they also include deaths along with the marriages and feasting usually associated with comic finales. Most were printed by Thomas Creede. McMillin and MacLean list a further thirteen plays (91–93), of which four are lost; Roslyn Knutson gets up to seventeen, although she concedes that what she is recognizing is Wilson’s influence on playwrights of the 1580s, with The Three Ladies of London as seminal in the development of the Queen’s Men repertory (Knutson 101). That is, her list, like McMillin’s and MacLean’s conjectures, might be Queen’s Men or might be imitations by other companies, including such plays as James IV, The Cobbler’s Prophecy, The Pedlar’s Prophecy, and Locrine as well as the Shakespeare-assigned Edmund Ironside, and the still anonymous Edward I. We decided, however, to stick with the strongest candidates and aim for ten complete performance editions with as little muddying of the water as possible.