Anthology Leads: Kate McPherson and Kate Moncrief.
Released with Early Modern England Encyclopedia 1.0a
Intellectual copyright in this entry is held by
Early Modern England Encyclopedia
By Cali Espinosa, inspired by
Encoded in TEI P5 according to the LEMDO Customization and Encoding Guidelines
This document uses Canadian English spelling
Across many ages, including in the early modern period, written or printed information for women has made many societies uneasy. Often, literacy and reading materials for women have been heavily controlled, and women denied education. During the Elizabethan era (1558–1603), girls were less likely than boys to be formally educated, and women could read and write in lower numbers than men. However, an estimated 25% of urban women in the period could both read and write at least their initials, compared to about 40% of urban men. So, the audience of literate women was less substantial, but it was still large enough that books and pamphlets for women were published in increasing numbers in the period. Books about cooking, household management and medicine, and religious instruction were commonly read by early modern women.
Measuring literacy in the early modern period is not simple, as there are no formal records for the dame schools or petty schools that operated in towns and villages, many of them run by women who taught basic literacy and numeracy out of their homes. Likewise, the definition of literacy itself is in question, with ongoing debates about if reading alone counts as literacy, or if people must both read and write to be counted as literate. Writing was taught as a separate skill from reading in the early modern period, which further complicates the investigation into who could read, as there are few historical records from or about those who could only read. Margaret W. Ferguson and Mihoko Suzuki point out that many definitions of literacy are tightly linked to theories of history that implicitly or explicitly privilege one term in a binary opposition over another: literate vs. oral, Renaissance vs. medieval, modern vs. primitive, cultured vs. barbaric, male vs. female
(1). It can be difficult to make a concrete definition when the foundations of a field of study are biased. In recent studies, scholars have increasingly relied on personal documents like diaries, journals, and letters for qualitative evidence of female literacy when quantitative data is unavailable.
Many books were published in the early modern period that detailed and taught ideal behavior for women, and most were written by men. Many of these books promoted the triad of virtues for women of the era: chastity, silence, and obedience.
Many books for women worked to teach these virtues. Conduct books of the period such as Juan Luis Vives
chastity is the principal virtue of a woman, and counterpoiseth with all the rest: if she have that, no man will look for any other, and if she lack that no man will regard other. Other books about female behavior were written by men, often Puritan clergymen, such as Robert Dod and John Cleaver’s 1598
One popular model text for women from this period is Gervase Markham’s
In this handbook, Markham reveals the pretty and curious secrets
of preparing everything from simple foods to such elaborate meals as a humble feast
—an undertaking that implies no less than two and thirty dishes, which is as much as can stand on one table
. He advises the housewife on brewing beer, caring for wine, and growing flax and hemp for thread and even prevention of everything like baldness and bad breath
.
Besides subjects like cooking and household medicine, many women of the era read religious commentaries, sermons, and other spiritual guides. Scholar Georgianna Ziegler notes, that many of the books owned by women were religious in nature,
. Frances Wolfreston (1607–1677), who had one of the largest libraries known for a non-noble woman, claimed a copy of a romance novel titled
(Ziegler). Women also made humorous, handwritten notes their books. An example includes Elizabeth Benne, who wrote in her copy of Dorothy Leigh’s
Elizabeth Benne is my name and with my pen I wrote the same and if my pen had been better I had write every letter.